Okay so to be clear hear RDF would giving the person the rod and the lure. The whole idea would be bake RDF into the currently published docs so it could be aggregated easier. Semantic Web concepts are all about original content having markup to describe what it is talking about which enables intelligent content aggregation. In the case of OpenBD we should be able to just modify the publishing to put additional markup in, easy as pie. I've really only just got into this stuff so I'm not to the point where I've screwed up enough to be competent. Good chance I'll start screwing up with OpenBDs docs soon though ;)
Adam On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Alan Williamson (aw2.0 ltd) < [email protected]> wrote: > All our functions for pulling out the documentation from the engine are > available to any CFML developer ... so again, you don't need us to do > anything, it can be a self-service model, just build something to format to > whatever you need. We can host the page on the main site for you. > > Why give people fish, when you can give people a rod! > > ;) > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Adam Haskell<[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I've been diving into Semantic Web stuff recently. Aggregating the >> content into a central place (like cfQuickDocs) would be a lot easier if >> we >> picked up something like RDF and ran with it. If each engine just >> published >> their docs with RDF in there a site like cfQuickDocs could merge/manage >> the >> data much better and help show compatibility issues. >> > > -- > Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List > http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon > online manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/ > > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon online manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
