Josh Hayes-Sheen said the following on 11/30/2010 01:11 PM:
On Nov 29, 10:33 pm, "Peter J. Farrell"<[email protected]> wrote:
Yep, OpenBD does not provide a stack trace because the way it "compiles"
code (and I use that loosely here because it's more like an execution
stack) is different.
ghrgrgh, that's going to be painful
How is it going to be painful? ACF Java stack traces are less than
useful in most circumstances and aren't provided in all circumstances
anyways. You still have the tag context array which is the most useful
to debug anything.
.pjf
P.s. I did change the subject of this thread...
--
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
official manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/
Ready2Run CFML http://www.openbluedragon.org/openbdjam/
mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
