Have you thought of using symlinks instead trying to alias things?
On Apr 28, 2011 1:21 PM, "Jari Ketola" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:53:43 PM UTC+3, Jordan Michaels wrote:
>>
>> > So maybe mod_jk is handling the cfm before mod_alias has a chance to
>> > touch it?
>>
>> Seems like a reasonable explaination to me.
>>
>> However, I'm not sure what governs the execution order of Apache
>> modules. I googled it a bit, and only found that Apache manages it using
>> an "internal" process. great >.<
>>
> That'll sure help in trying to fine tune it. ;-)
>
>> You could try using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk and place your mod_proxy
>> directives under your alias directives. Perhaps they will get executed
>> first?
>>
>> Just a guess!
>>
> Actually I've thought about giving it a shot before, but haven't because
of
> performance worries.
>
> Having now learned more about the way mod_jk and ajp actually work, I'm
> starting to understand why AliasMatch doesn't work, and probably can't
work
> either. As AliasMatch does mapping to files, not URIs, and mod_jk is
> basically just a proxy, aliasing doesn't have an effect on .cfm templates.
>
> So I guess what I'm looking for is another way of handing .cfm files in
> Apache - something similar to BD Free's servlet-exec that just handles all

> the files thrown at it without proxying. Is there a way to accomplish
this?
> Something that would just throw .cfm and .cfc files to OpenBD for
> processing. Something that would allow me to keep all my (tens, if not
100+)
> VirtualHosts in Apache configuration alone. The outlook of configuring
every
> single virtual host variation in both Apache and server.xml is rather
> depressing to say the least, and feels very Department of Redundancy
> Departmentish.
>
> Jari
>
> --
> official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/
> mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

-- 
official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/
 mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

Reply via email to