Sounds like that to me too, But as you say need to step through it. I personally wouldn't front it with Apache have found that tomcat has plugins/ports for most of the apache mod_? feature set.
Cheers A On 10 November 2011 22:56, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Alex Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nope don't agree its expected behaviour something is a miss you should be >> able to have to different host headers pointing to different folders and it >> should be looking at that. >> > > Well sure, you can, and maybe I just need to see more of the configuration > that's going on here. Probably talking out of turn since I didn't read the > original stuff all that closely. > > What it SOUNDS like is happening is that the host he's using isn't > matching any of the hosts declared in Tomcat. Hence it'll hit Tomcat simply > due to the host name resolving to the local machine, and with the addition > of the port it'll route to Tomcat. If after that Tomcat doesn't match the > host name, then the behavior he's seeing will apply. > > So without seeing the configuration file in its entirety it sounds like > that's what's going on. > > -- > Matthew Woodward > [email protected] > http://blog.mattwoodward.com > identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward > > Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, > etc. as attachments. > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html > > -- > official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > -- Alex Skinner Managing Director Pixl8 Interactive Tel: +448452600726 Email: [email protected] Web: pixl8.co.uk -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
