> When I came from ACF to OpenBD, my first urge was to create an "Adobe-like" > setup, in which one monster CF engine powered all my CF apps.
Sounds like me, I am also new to OpenBD after 10+ years on Adobe. Don't want to make that mistake exactly, that is why I am asking. > After a while, I realized that the OpenBD war was so lightweight that the > problems were all in my head. Now I just deploy one OpenBD engine-per-app and > things are surprisingly easier, especially in the pathing and cgi vars > department. I don't know how many of us do it one way vs the other. Is that also one Tomcat/Jetty instance per OpenBD-engine-per-app? So one Tomcat instance with multiple apps and each app containing the OpenBD-engine? And we often have one app with two interfaces (or more), like frontend- and backend-interface. You have that in one app I suppose, in subdirs with proxying arranging the access, right? -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
