But # as a variable evaluator only means something to Coldfusion. I would
like to see a few enhancements to cfscrpt language=javascript to make
working with coldfusion variables easier but not sure i'd go that route.

My 2p

A

On Monday, 23 January 2012, Aaron J. White <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right, but the idea would be that cfjavascript defaults to NOT
> evaluate coldfusion variables. Only when an attribute like
> evaluateVars = true will cfjavascript worry about it. If someone gets
> errors because they set the attribute to true then that's kind of the
> developers fault.
>
> What do you think?
>
> On Jan 23, 3:15 am, "Alan Williamson (aw2.0 cloud experts)"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> While on principal a good idea, it could be a nightmare.
>>
>> The reason is that the # character is commonly found in CSS/Javascript
>> blocks, and therefore you would be forcing people to go and escape them
>> (##) which would completely null'n'void the whole drop-in nature of
>> these two tags.
>>
>> --
>>    aw2.0 ltd :::http://about.me/aw2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Aaron J. White wrote:
>> > I messed with cfjavascript and stylesheet today and it seems really
>> > cool. There was one thing I couldn't do that I wish I could. It would
>> > be nice if cfjavascript (and maybe stylesheet) had an attribute that
>> > would make it double as a cfoutput when placing code inline. Does that
>> > seem reasonable? Sorry for the .net reference.
>
> --
> online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
>   google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462
>     http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
>
>     Join us @ http://www.OpenCFsummit.org/ Dallas, Feb 2012
>

-- 
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
   google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462
     http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

     Join us @ http://www.OpenCFsummit.org/ Dallas, Feb 2012

Reply via email to