> are the mod_jk and the mod_proxy_ajp > connector conceptually the same?
Under most circumstances, yes. They each offer some different options, but generally they both communicate with Tomcat via AJP, so iin that regard they are identical. Mod_jk offers a few more features, but mod_proxy is a little more flexible.
Bottom line, use whatever works for you. If you're using mod_proxy_ajp now and it's working how you need it to, there's no real reason to change.
Warm Regards, Jordan Michaels On 02/24/2012 08:36 AM, Steve Of LA wrote:
Hi all, I had been using the Xampp with added Tomcat, OpenBD, and the mod_jk connector. The latest Xampp has included Tomcat and the mod_proxy_ajp connector. I followed the instructions for Single Install Connector to add in the mod_jk, but now I'm thinking that I didn't need to do that. I'm new to the internals of web servers, but can follow directions. I guess my real question is: are the mod_jk and the mod_proxy_ajp connector conceptually the same? Should I back out the mod_jk connector and alter the Single Install Connector instructions to configure the mod_proxy_ajp connector? I think I'm close, but Murphy has certainly thrown me into the 80/20 pool again. Thanx in advance, Steve -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en Join us @ http://www.OpenCFsummit.org/ Dallas, Feb 2012
-- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en Join us @ http://www.OpenCFsummit.org/ Dallas, Feb 2012
