On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Aaron J. White <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any possibility OpenBD will get any of that cool functionality > that Railo has where every app has it's own admin page? > It does, if you have individual apps. I can't speak for Alan but I don't think there's any plans in the works to do the split server admin/web admin setup (which personally I find quite goofy to be honest). > I remember them demoing something like that during Open CF Summit. I guess > the main use was for CFML host or people using CFML hosting, but I figured > it's somewhat related. > Right, it's a very limited use case which from my perspective isn't worth the effort and comes with its share of issues. Nothing against Railo, more power to them if that's what their userbase wants/needs, I've just always found it quite odd. > > but what I find OpenBD really needs is more host supporting it > You mean shared hosting? I guess I don't understand when people bring this up ideally what they'd like to see. Shared hosting is garbage, you can get a VPS for a song these days, there's cloud solutions like CloudBees and Jelastic ... what specifically do you mean here? -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
