Hi Duncan, On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:41:38PM -0700, Duncan Smith wrote: > I'm presently attemping to work with the code here: > <http://cgit.osmocom.org/cgit/erlang>.
What exactly are you trying to achieve? The code is currently not in a state that makes it easy to use for anyone not intimately familiar with it. It's mainly developed to fulfill whatever current (customer) requirement I have, and has many undocumented shortcomings and pitfalls. I hope it eventually will emerge into something more generalized, but until I get around writing some MAP applications (startin with a HLR), it will probably remain in its current state. Some of the code is used in production 24/7, a lot of other code has never been running outside of my lab. > Is there something I'm missing? (I just started working with Erlang > this week, so I may be missing something completely obvious.) I think > the main issue is the makefiles aren't putting generated asn.1 code in > places that Erlang expects to see headers and code, and the makefiles > don't chain together. :) Anything but the signerl code is built with rebar, not with make. So I guess if there are still any makefiles, they should be deleted from the tree. -- - Harald Welte <lafo...@gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
