On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:32:41PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote: > > I agree that it's somewhat harder than pasting the patch into a mail, but > > it is > > achievable ;) > > Hmm, it's probably achievable if you are planning on working on the project > for > some time, but for me who just want to provide a patch, it appeared to be a > bit > of a pain. :) I'm sure it's great when it works though!
My humble opinion for the last time: gerrit has overly complicated nearly every aspect of working on the code. The web ui is bloated and cumbersome to navigate, and every commit and push needs goofy hacks just for gerrit :( It does add handy features of tracking patches and managing reviews, yet it kind of removes the concept of patch-set grouping. Of course, the integrated jenkins build is excellent to have (though would be sufficient after pushing). I submit to the community's decision to use gerrit, and I don't think it would be worth the trouble to switch yet again (if I'm the only one moaning), but I wouldn't introduce gerrit a second time. End-Of-Rant for all eternity ;) ~Neels
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
