On 28/05/18 12:41, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > Ah, I understand now. I got the wording the wrong way, thought you wrote "we > accept Periodic LU *only* for detached MS" while you meant to say "when a > Periodic LU comes in for a detached phone, we simply accept it".
Ah yes. Sorry. "just" can be ambiguous in English. I should endeavor to not use it. > > Ok, yes, the idea remains: not trigger SMPP signals on the periodic-ness of > the > LU, but rather wherever the MSC decides to change between "attached" and > "detached". For the moment, what I've done is extend the SMPP availability statuses and send a different status for IMSI_ATTACH to PERIODIC The my SMPP listener is reacting differently depending on the status.. This works for the moment for the application in hand, but I assume it's not something we want to be concerned about in master. k
