Hi Pau, > For instance in GSM I see RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, etc. but those were never > really necessary afaik because they always come on top of Um, which is > the protocol we encapsulate with gsmtap.
What Vadim said explains my intention. I want to avoid attaching unneeded pseudo-Um header when only RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, (even RR) PDUs are available. > AFAIU "uint8_t metadata[0];" is where the T16L16V is placed? Yes, exactly. Best, Shinjo 2024년 5월 13일 월요일 오전 10시 50분 12초 CEST에 Pau Espin Pedrol 님이 쓴 글: > Hi Sinjo, > > I wonder whether we should be allocating gsmtap types for protocols > which had to use alone so far. > For instance in GSM I see RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, etc. but those were never > really necessary afaik because they always come on top of Um, which is > the protocol we encapsulate with gsmtap. > I understand that somebody may want to encapsulate eg LLC directly, but > until there's a explicit need for it I'd perhaps avoid adding them to > the list. > > AFAIU "uint8_t metadata[0];" is where the T16L16V is placed? > > Regards, > Pau
