On 01-10-26 10:57:25 CEST, Michael Bell wrote:
> The actual plan is:
>
> src/
> servers/
> ca/
> ra/
> public/ or pub/
> ocsp/
i feel there is a conflict on the meta level.
ocsp (and e.g. ldap) are protocols, ca, ra and pub are not, they are
configuration instances of (an) http server(s).
why not
servers/
http/
ca/
ra/
pub/
ocsp/
ldap/ (where's that hidden currently?)
> data/
data what?
data manipulation?
data storage?
the latter?
wouldn't "storage/" be more precise then?
> data-exchange/
> database/ (if DBM is used)
what do you mean by this comment?
what do you want to put in this *source* directory?
> openssl/
> serial
> index.txt
why do we need this directory with these files?
index.txt is initially empty and serial contains a single number, i.e.
one echo and touch command in a makefile, respectively...
> common/
> conf/
> the structure of the old src/conf/
> images/
> lib/
> modules/
> don't listed here
> scripts/
> javascript/ (wait for comments about the code)
why not put data/'s contents into common/?
the data structures are common, aren't they?
perhaps
data/data-exchange -> common/data/exchange
data/database -> common/data/storage
data/openssl -> common/data/storage/Makefile?
?
rj
_______________________________________________
OpenCA-Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
