Question abaut the used dbm stuff - just some thoughts for the next steps not the current release ,o) for the moment the current solution should be sufficient and also be able to handle some ten of thousends of mails
it uses $key, $value; my current implentation just stores the msg-ids and the messages itself are still save in the mail-dirs, can we put the mail-msg as value in those dbms? this can be done in the per maildir dbm file for example, so we avoid the 'problems' with large volumes of mail and don't get ten of thousends of mail in an directory - i think dbms can handle this - or?
since the msg-id is the key and the msg itself would be the value, but i havn't work so much with this dbm stuff, so i just don't know also in the question of speed and so on...
greetings dalini
-- Ives Steglich Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Administration Tel.: +49 (0)3677 - 69 4382/4383 Fax: +49 (0)3677 - 69 4399
Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Media Technology Langewiesener Strasse 22 98693 Ilmenau Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany http://www.openca.org
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ OpenCA-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
