Re: OODL: a fondamental idea

[DeRobertis]

At 1:52 PM +1000 on 4/4/00, Adrian Sutton wrote:

>Adrian: Hmm, while I haven't fully thought this through, with *my* parser
>you should be able to get it to parse new syntax into bytecode (which has to
>be already supported by the interpreter) without a recompile.  :P  Ahh,
>competition already!

Hmmm.... I could just add in a general bytecode assembler :)