W dniu 20 sierpnia 2009 17:31 użytkownik Jon Nettleton <[email protected]> napisał: > We talked about this some months ago on the openchrome-devel mailing > list and decided it was not worth it to make the change. Switching to > git requires changing and updating track and various other things. > You are free to use git--svn to mirror a local git repository that you > can work off of.
I found some threads about fd/git, but not a one with serious discission with (contr)arguments. Could you point me to archived thread you mean? 2009/8/21 Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]>: > Coreboot is not using git, it uses svn. Yet, i am working with git on > the coreboot repos. > > Git-svn does work quite well. Check it out, you'll notice that it suits > most of your needs. > > But sadly, some things are not supported by svn, like separate > author/commiter tracking and such, so that information gets lost > completely. Well, if everyone encourage me to use git-svn (I think Thomas also did), everyone can see positives of using git and we are still using svn... something's wrong. For now I would like to discuss switching *code*only. Let's think about wiki/trac maybe later, in other topic. Why I'm not 100% happy with git-svn: 1) It's not native 2) As mentioned, it looses some important data (commit's author!) 3) I don't have cgit web interface What problems with moving code to git can you see? The only one I can see is we can not link to git's commits in tickets anymore. Now we could just type "r587" to link to http://www.openchrome.org/trac/changeset/587 . Are there any other problems? -- Rafał Miłecki _______________________________________________ Openchrome-devel mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-devel
