On 01/11/2011 10:19 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 21:54 +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: >> On 01/11/2011 09:08 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 15:51 +0000, James Simmons wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I just finished the KMS/UMS reordering. Please test my branch to >>>> make sure their are no regressions. Currently no really KMS code has been >>>> added just yet. Minus any regressions this wraps up phase one. >>>> >>>> http://svn.openchrome.org/svn/branches/kms_branch >>> >>> Hi James, >>> >>> This sounds like excellent work. Thanks for taking on the project! >>> >>> For the VX855-based OLPC XO-1.5, if I understand it correctly, we >>> currently cannot use DRM because there is no Chrome9 support in the >>> kernel. I guess that means that your work on this front is inaccessible >>> to us. >>> >> At this point, drm support is not strictly needed, as the UMS code as >> just been separated, but the driver should behave just like it was >> before the refactoring. It will be though for KMS. > > Having trouble understanding what you mean here. > > You are stating that the driver will continue to work on VX855 (with > mode setting in userspace, as it is currently)? > > I gathered that much. My question is whether KMS will become available > on VX855/Chrome9. It will solve a handful of headaches for OLPC. > ok, sorry, I misunderstood your question too.
About Chrome9 drm, I don't know what James' plan are. Regards, Xavier _______________________________________________ Openchrome-devel mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-devel
