On 01/26/2011 12:43 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 19 January 2011 01:20, Xavier Bachelot <[email protected]> wrote: >> Testing on a VX900 laptop with drm-next + your patch + 2 others patches. >> One adds some Chrome9 pciids (patch 2) > > I suspect that patch is incorrect or at least a bit premature. > Chrome9 requires changes to the existing code, it won't just be a case > of adding IDs. > VIA submitted a totally separate DRM driver (see > http://marc.info/?a=123010403800004&r=1&w=2) for this hardware. > > If the hardware really is disimilar, then having a separate DRM driver > probably makes sense (and this probably leads to a different X.org > driver too). But I'm not sure to what extent that is the case. > Chrome9 chipsets are severely restricted currently. adding the pci ids shouldn't hurt.
Here's the initial commit adding Chrome9 "support" : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=a16a8a47cdb04e29f5d8ed05403f21714f7aaf9d Regards, Xavier _______________________________________________ Openchrome-devel mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-devel
