On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 19:09:38 +0000 (GMT) James Simmons <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:49:07 +0000 (GMT) > > James Simmons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Also nice :-) I have a new snapshot. > > > > > > http://www.infradead.org/~jsimmons/xf86-video-openchrome-0.3.0-pre20120301.tbz > > > > > > > Not Found > > > > The requested > > URL /~jsimmons/xf86-video-openchrome-0.3.0-pre20120301.tbz was not > > found on this server. > > Foudn a bug for which I had to do another update. > > http://www.infradead.org/~jsimmons/xf86-video-openchrome-0.3.0-pre20120302.tbz > > Give it a try now. > Very nice! It works! It is still painfully slow though, compared to the 0.2.x version. It is on the limit of usable but I do have high requirements for "usable". The regression I previously reported are still there: http://wiki.openchrome.org/pipermail/openchrome-devel/2011-September/000578.html I did noticed, that this happens only when I have compositing enabled in XFCE. If I disable compositing it works. I also wonder if it would be an idea to get the kernel part into staging area in kernel. Then it might be possible to push it out for testing earlier. If not, is it easy to backport it to some of the current kernels? Thanks! -nc _______________________________________________ Openchrome-devel mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-devel
