2012/4/6 Lluís Batlle i Rossell <[email protected]>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 08:50:18PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:16:36PM -0300, Mario Rugiero wrote: > > > I'm not sure. To talk about the path I think I should know the > algorithm > > > used. The thing is that flash uses your CPU only, so all the processing > > > consumes CPU cycles, mplayer, since it uses xv, uses the GPU for some > > > operations, thus using less CPU cycles than flash. The algorithm used > can > > > actually be the same, mplayer could be even more resource consuming > > > overall, but it uses less CPU because its process is done elsewhere, > that's > > > what I mean. > > > > I've seen that the destination lines of my test go to the AGP addresses, > > 0xb0000000. > > > > I've also tried x11perf -shmput500, which may be similar to what > flashplayer > > uses. I get a maximum of 53/s; What do you get, in K8M800/K8N800? > > > > If flash takes 50% of the cpu, may be at the limit for 25fps with the > 50% left.. > > > > I've tested a slightly newer notebook, with an Intel controller, and > 'x11perf > > -shmput500' gives 1150/s, which is about 20 times more... Shouldn't the > > unichrome chip do more than 53/s? > > > > Ah, Mario, remember that my system shows 50% of usage of flash, 50% of > usage of > X. The usage of X is in that backtrace I pasted at the first post. I don't > try > to fix the 50% of usage of flash, but that of X. > Oh, sorry the, I misread it.
_______________________________________________ openchrome-users mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-users Main page: http://www.openchrome.org Wiki: http://wiki.openchrome.org User Forum: http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=1
