Thanks. To bad I missed your presentation during the engineering meeting. Sounds pretty interesting.
Looking forward to seeing the demo later. From: Rajat Ghai <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, June 13, 2016 at 7:28 PM To: Jeremy Huylebroeck <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Opencompute-networking] example of using OCP gear for enterprise/campus networks? "Is it something you can show?" Yes, but not on OCP white box Wi-Fi APs , we are in the process of getting a NOS (linux) up and running for Edge-Core submitted Wi-Fi AP designs. These are Broadcom designs and we need a modern kernel 3.x or beyond to really support network names paces and some advanced networking topologies using Linux netlink. These APs don't are storage (Flash) constrained so a stock linux distro would not work. Probably not even ONL . We are currently in the process of working towards building a openWRT distro for these Wi-Fi APs. Once openWRT is ported (3.18.23 kernel version we are shoot for, as of now) , user space network automation framework would work without much mods. We are shooting for a demo in the fall OCP networking workshop, location TBD. BR Rajat Ghai On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:52 PM, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: * How large can be the deployments of a CBW? >>>> Large as in per site OR # of sites (multi site L2 / L3 VPNs etc) ? >>>> Regardless, the scale of the deployments is really based on traffic >>>> dimensioning and other factors , hard to provide a generic answer ; as >>>> such there should not be any hard / artificial limits . The question was also broad to understand the thinking that was taken into account for not only performance and services but also manageability or cost. * What operating system you choose for the switches? >>>>>> The Switches have choice of any NOS ; AFAIK, currently there is support >>>>>> for ONL, Cumulus and maybe Ubuntu Snappy (Ubuntu folks can confirm >>>>>> availability) ; Going forward We (OCP+Benu) are focusing on tooling and >>>>>> instrumentation as well as dynamic network topology management of 10s of >>>>>> thousands of such campus/branches. So the idea is to open source entirely the hardware and software foundation via OCP? That would be great in this case for our own usage. * Is the network team developer enough in its mindset to program some advanced rules/automation or handle the Linux CLI? >>> Yea.. centrally managed IFTTT style automation for multiple branches from a >>> CBW manager in the Data Center. Is it something you can show? * Was the architecture and hardware sort of over-provisioned for future use cases (ex: x86 CPU, more memory, more ports, bigger ports, fiber)? >>>>> CBW H/W is always price sensitive and hence compute / storage constraint. >>>>> In the current state, you can assume a dual core ARM SoC as a compute >>>>> engine in the White Box APs and Switches. Flash any where from 256 MB to >>>>> a few GBs, DRAM from 128 MBs to 1 GB ; From compute perspective, the CBW >>>>> switches prolly would can run containerized workloads, but it is tough to >>>>> do it on the APs, though we are using LXC on the openWRT NOS on APs. The >>>>> benefit of running containerized workloads on the CBW gear is to >>>>> facilitate automated dark launches w/o destabilizing the networking >>>>> topology. Definitely interested as well in containerized apps/functions on the switches. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ opencompute-networking mailing list Unsubscribe: http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking [email protected] http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking
