Dear S Karthikeyan,

Dear Marilen Corciovei,

> first allow me to thank you for putting together all these tools for 
> simple installation and use. Yet I am having a question related to how 
> much overhead these architecture can impose upon a machine. I am 
> planning to buy the opencomputing platform for use on a system with a 
> max of 100mails/sec. Can such a thing be doable? What hardware 
> architecture do you suggest.

I'd like to get some more info on your requirements:

1) What are the other software you're planning to run on the openprotect 
machine? Is it just a relaying mail server through which mails are 
scanned by openprotect and sent to a POP3/IMAP store or a server which 
runs the mail server, POP3, IMAP and also a webmail?

There is no other required software running on these machines, these will be dedicated relay only servers.

2)Do you already have a mail gateway which is handling 100 mails/sec? If 
yes, more details on your current hardware will help us in specifying 
the hardware for openprotect.

No. We are considering distributing the weight on a few 2 or 4 processor machines. 

3)What is the average size of each mail? How many such mails do you 
transfer per day? Because, if all the 100 mails/sec are 2 KB mails, the 
load is very less. On the other hand, if they're 1 MB, then the load is 
going to be very high.

No, only the peek is estimated at 100 mails/sec which correspond to around a max of 3 milions messages per day. The messages repartition will be normal with only about 2-3% of messages > 1M.
cheers,
Karthikeyan, S.

Thanks for your help

Marilen Aretius Corciovei

Independent J2EE, Linux consultant

http://nemesisit.rdsnet.ro/len

http://www.nemesisit.ro

Reply via email to