Hello all..
What is the final outcome of the " -: in the header" issue?
a) patch Header.pm? (Ref: <x-tad-bigger>Brian PASSANTE)</x-tad-bigger>
b) The Qmail/QMDiskStore.pm patches?
I just noticed that the openprotect-5.0.1.6 package file QMDiskStore.pm is a different newer version to the patch file offered on the website via the mailing list.
And the files part of the openprotect package offer no patch for the -: issue
I just wanted to know the final status of this is?
Ells..
openprotect package files:
-----------------------------
$Id: QMDiskStore.pm,v 1.1.2.1 2004/02/07 15:18:22 jkf Exp $
$Id: Qmail.pm,v 1.1.2.2 2004/03/24 10:12:27 jkf Exp $
Patch files
--------------
$Id: QMDiskStore.pm,v 0.1.0.0 2003/11/25 04:50:45 kmg Exp $
$Id: Qmail.pm,v 1.1.2.2 2004/03/24 10:12:27 jkf Exp $
<x-tad-bigger>
</x-tad-bigger>
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailSc... Clive Eisen
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] Ma... t.a. coen
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] Ma... Clive Eisen
- [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash Brian PASSANTE
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner cr... S Karthikeyan
- [Opencomputing-openprotect] problems in co... Allori Lorenzo
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] proble... K.M.Ganesh
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] pr... Allori Lorenzo
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotec... K.M.Ganesh
- Re: [Opencomputing-openpr... Allori Lorenzo
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner crash elliot moore
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanner cr... K.M.Ganesh
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailScanne... K.M.Ganesh
- Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] MailSc... J�r�me MOLLIER-PIERRET
