> I'm ok by setting an inception offset >0 sec, but strictly I don't understand > why PT0S would be invalid. Could you shed some light on this one? > > Also, I believe you already fixed this in trunk on 1st of June. It's just > still in 1.1.0 which we are planning to use for production.
Now that I have seen the error, I can confirm that this is a known bug with the 1.1.0 release (auditor raises invalid errors with InceptionOffset == 0), which has been fixed in future versions. The "PT0S" notation is valid, and will work on the 1.1.1 release. HTH, Alex._______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
