On 7.5.2015 13:31, Elizabeta wrote: > Thank you for the quick responding. > I have not yet checked the v2.4, but it seems that there were only draft > versions for the PKCS#11 v 2.30 specification, and the latest official > version is 2.20?
PKCS#11 specification was handed over to OASIS and version 2.40 was officially released on 2015-04-14, i.e. ~ 3 weeks ago. 2.40 Announcement: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/pkcs11/201504/msg00020.html Technical committee claims this: "This draft builds on the foundation of PKCS #11 V2.30, and is backwards compatible to PKCS #11 V2.20. " https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=pkcs11 2.40 Standards: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?wg_abbrev=pkcs11 For review of Cryptography Changes in v2.40 see https://wiki.oasis-open.org/pkcs11/FrontPage . I hope this helps. Have a nice day! Petr Spacek @ Red Hat > Does this means, that the SoftHSM will handle the v2.40 and not v2.30 as > initially planned ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best regards, > Elizabeta > > Le 7 mai 2015 à 13:00, [email protected] a écrit : >> Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 12:29:52 +0200 >> From: Petr Spacek <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Opendnssec-user] PKCS11 Specification version >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 >> >> On 7.5.2015 09:59, Elizabeta wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I have a small question about PKCS#11 specification and SoftHSM v2. >>> Is SoftHSM v2 under the v2.20 or v2.30 PKCS#11 specification ? >>> >>> Thank you in advance. >> >> Some things like constants for AES key wrapping mechanisms are already taken >> from 2.40. I'm not sure about the rest. >> >> -- >> Petr Spacek @ Red Hat _______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
