Thanks for the suggestion. On 15 May 2016 at 13:13, Emil Natan <[email protected]> wrote:
> As a rule of a thumb (for me at least), if DNS/DNSSEC is your core > business go for the source and building the software by yourself. You would > like finer control over build and features. Otherwise stick with whatever > provided by the OS. > > ena > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Arun N S <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Any recommendation for the opendnssec / softhsm installation candidates >> for production? Should we stick with the OS shipped >> version softhsm-2.0.0rc1-3.el7.x86_64, opendnssec-1.4.7-3.el7.x86_64 >> (incase of Redhat 7) or compile and install the latest stable from >> opendnssec.org? >> >> thanks, >> >> -- >> arun >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opendnssec-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
