> A couple of weeks ago I asked for tests of a large patch submitted from > redhat.
What kind of large patch was it from RedHat? I do not remember about it. The OpenDx 4.0.10 as of march 13th CVS, using MOTIF 2.1.21, GCC 2.95.2, X11R6.4 (which is XFree86 4.0 final Release), ImageMagick 5.1.1 netCDF, CDF 2.7 and HDF4.1r3 builds on my RedHat Linux 6.1 and RedHat RawHide without troubles, also binaries are stable. I do not see a diferences (stability etc) between binaries I released on march 3rd, after NetCDF bug was fixed therefore I did not bother to package it. Suhaib >We heard back from Jeff with his partial OK, and that's > it. I think > these patches should go in and we should fix obvious breakage > prior to 4.1 . > Pete > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I'm in. Any objections? > > > > BTW. I have a version that uses MS tools under the standard gnu build > > structure ready for checkin. In addition to making lots of code changes > > for MS, I did wrappers for the MS compilers etc. that make them > compatible > > with the gnu tools, and have MSVC6 projects for everything. I > think its a > > necessary step before checking in the true Windows version of > the exec that > > doesn't require Exceed and supports the ActiveDX component stuff. > > > > So. Are we go for 4.1.0? > > > > Greg > > > > "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on > > 03/14/2000 07:43:30 AM > > > > Please respond to opendx2-dev@lists.berlios.de > > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: <opendx2-dev@lists.berlios.de> > > cc: > > Subject: [opendx-dev] Which version number to use > > > > Are we going to declare 4.0.10 are 4.1.0? > > > > I am trying to get OpenDx binaries compiled by using Exceed XDK 6.2 and > > MSVC > > 6.0 > > out of door. MSVC compilation requires a lot of manual > editings, if we are > > set on declaring 4.0.10 as 4.1.0 then I might bump the version > number now, > > instead of redoing it again. > > After the release of Windows 2000 Microsoft SDK has a lot of new headers > > and it required a good amount of OpenDx 4.0.10 source patching. M$ is > > about > > to > > release MSVC 7.0 which would have a lot of Win64 releated library and > > header > > changes again. > > We would need to do a lot of patching again after MSVC 7.0 is > released. It > > may make binaries > > unstable at that time. I prefer to see the DX version bumped > now before we > > get into another cycle of > > unstable binaries due to changes in compilers and libraries. > > > > Suhaib
