In een bericht met de datum 12-5-2006 13:42:29 West-Europa (zomertijd), schrijft gfrer at luna.nl:
> > Hi Sam, > > The EHR-system cannot function without State models. > There will be archetypes that contain state models. > Because they are expressions of business rules and other domain knowledge. > Therefor the Archetype Ontology will have at least one State Model. > > > The EHR will contain a (implicit?) State Model! > (This is to the contrary of what I have written in a recent e-mail) > As sais before, the HL7 state machine is based on years of experience, and if we talk about harmonizing, these are exactly the items that would apply in CEN 13606. Then the lacking items in OpenEHR can be enhanced too. This state machine operates on Act, which can be any clinical EHR entry, and you could limit the Act attributes if you want (except the status code of course, because that is what you need). William -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060512/ff383555/attachment.html>
