Just some field information for endoscopic and echographic reports.

For endoscopic exams, we are used to writing : Device type, 
Manufacturer, Model, Serial Number (for endoscopes tracability)
Example: Colonoscope Pentax HR200 s/n 234EB22
But, for practical reasons, don't forget that users don't always know 
the s/n and usually are using other way to locally select a material 
(for example "blue mark" or the first or last letters of the s/n).

For echographic exams, it is usually Device type, Manufacturer, Model 
and Service date (to indicate recentness).
I am not aware of recording sub-devices (like echography probes) 
information... even if this is an important part and the one that 
"touch" the patient.

Colin Sutton wrote:
> To keep it simple, the minimum information on a device should include:
>
>     * Device Name
>     * Device Description (purpose)
>     * Manufacturer
>     * Model Identifier
>     * Serial Number [may be N/A]
>     * Firmware version [may be N/A]
>
> Other information could be included:
>
>     * Service Date(s)
>     * Modifications or adaptations,
>     * Associated or connected devices
>     * Distributor
>     * Location
>
> Regards,
>
> Colin Sutton
> IT Systems Development Manager
> NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre
> http://www.ctc.usyd.edu.au <http://www.ctc.usyd.edu.au/>
>
> -----Original Messag e-----
> *From:* openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org 
> [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Sam Heard
> *Sent:* Friday, 31 August 2007 10:36 AM
> *To:* openEHR-Clinical; MelvinR at AMS-Consulting.co.uk
> *Subject:* Device information in the EHR
>
>     Hi Everyone
>
>     I have just returned home after many weeks of meetings which have
>     been an extraordinary experience - but one involved a session at
>     the ISO meeting in Brisbane with the devices group and Melvin
>     Reynolds. He is interested in standardising the information we
>     keep about the device as part of the observation protocol.
>
>     We have agreed to try and get a standard model (a cluster in
>     openEHR) that we use to record information about the device used
>     to make the observation. It was raised at the meeting that the
>     laboratory will retain a great deal of information - the point is
>     that some of this might be critical in the future (such as the
>     identification of the device if systematic errors are later
>     reported which might mean we should not accept the findings from
>     this device as sufficiently accurate).
>
>     I would like to start a thread where we agree on the information
>     about the DEVICE - this is not about the value (ie the accuracy of
>     the measurement can be added to the reading and should be there we
>     believe) - so it is about the device itself.
>
>     What do people suggest?
>
>     Cheers, Sam Heard
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>
>         Dr. Sam Heard
>         MBBS, FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI
>
>     CEO and Clinical Director
>     Ocean Informatics Pty. Ltd.
>     <http://www.oceaninformatics.biz/>Adjunct Professor, Health
>     Informatics, Central Queensland University
>     Senior Visiting Research Fellow, CHIME, University College London
>     Chair, Standards Australia, EHR Working Group (IT14-9-2)
>     Australia
>
>     /    Ph: +61 (0)4 1783 8808/
>     /    Fx: +61(0)8 8948 0215/
>     UK
>      /    Ph: +44 (0)77 9871 0980/
>     /    Fx: +44 (0)207 1174610/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and 
> cleared by *MailMarshal *
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended 
> only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and 
> may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or 
> privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The 
> CTC is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail 
> or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the 
> individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the CTC. If 
> you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it and 
> notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this 
> e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical


Reply via email to