Is a protocol a cluster archetype or a component of an observation?
http://www.openehr.org/137-OE.html defines the term 'protocol' as an attribute 
of CARE_ENTRY.
 
A clinical trial protocol document may define a collection of trial specific 
observations (as used in the openEHR protocol sense), for example a trial 
specific definition (e.g. of an MI) or reference ranges of blood chemistry that 
differ for males and females and by country of birth, or a new procedure not 
yet in SNOMED.
 
A 'Protocol' cluster archetype seems to me to be a 'protocol document' or a 
reference set of such specialisations.
 
Or am I trying to overload too much onto the meaning?
 
Colin Sutton
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre 
http://www.ctc.usyd.edu.au <http://www.ctc.usyd.edu.au/>  


        -----Original Message-----
        From: openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org 
[mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Gerard Freriks
        Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:16 AM
        To: For openEHR clinical discussions
        Cc: ?mer Hotomaroglu
        Subject: Re: maximum heart rate
        
        
        Dear all, 

        I agree with Sam.
        States. Protocols are Cluster archetypes that can be/will be re-used in 
ENTRY Archetypes..
        Are there more?
        Demographics/Localisations, ...

        Gerard
        
        
        

        -- <private> -- 
        Gerard Freriks, MD
        Huigsloterdijk 378
        2158 LR Buitenkaag
        The Netherlands

        T: +31 252544896
        M: +31 620347088
        E:     gfrer at luna.nl


        Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little 
temporary 
        Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 
1755





        On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Sam Heard wrote:


                Hi Andrew
                
                We now have a reason to provide a cluster for exercise related 
state - to share this between the heart rate and bp and possibly other 
archetypes. So I would suggest that we think about the state as a cluster. It 
would seem that there is the idea of a category of exercise - maximal or some 
such. We need to hear from people who are experts in this area (Omer may have 
some answers).
                
                So I would suggest that the investigation is a stress test - it 
will be a composition probably as a report. I do not think it will be recorded 
as a procedure in the EHR - but it can be. I would see recording the action 
(from a request) that the order was completed as the main form.
                
                It will contain measurements of BP and Heart rate. Each will 
have state data on exercise level. This should be a cluster archetype which is 
about the level of exercise at a point in time.
                
                So my suggestion is that we go for a cluster on exercise level 
for use in State on a few observations. Who has the data that will need to be 
entered.
                
                % of Maximal for age is like a percentile chart in weight or 
height (normal). At the moment the normal range can be added to the data point. 
I am not sure that we have the idea of percentile as part of this - the closest 
thing is the normal_status attribute which provides a means of stating whether 
the level is very high or low as for HL7 v2. We could extend this to include 
the idea of percentiles based on normal range (eg 25 if 25% of people have a 
level at or below this level). The idea of maximal heart rate for age is a 
reference range and can be added to the peak heart rate - with a percentage as 
part of the normal_status.
                
                The alternative is adding data points for these measurements - 
which is not a great problem but would mean adding to the weight and height 
archetypes.
                
                I am interested in what others think.
                
                Cheers, Sam



#####################################################################################
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared 
by MailMarshal
#####################################################################################

####################################################################################################################

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be 
read or used by the named addressee. 
It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No 
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost 
by any mistaken transmission to you. The CTC is not responsible for any 
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or 
attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender, and are not necessarily the 
views of the CTC. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
delete it and notify the sender. You must 
not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended 
recipient.

#####################################################################################################################
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071218/0f4d674f/attachment.html>

Reply via email to