In een bericht met de datum 27-1-2007 10:54:32 West-Europa (standaardtijd), schrijft gfrer at luna.nl:
> On 27-jan-2007, at 1:27, Tim Churches wrote: > > >> Agree. As a public health epidemiologist, I am personally interested in >> how openEHR might perform in the setting of population-based data >> collections, where millions (or tens or hundreds of millions) of records >> and large aggregate queries, such as cross-tabulation queries - are the >> norm. We know that traditional normalised relational databases don't cut >> the mustard for such purposes, keen to see whether openEHR does. >> > Dear Tim, It might be of interest to you that probably March I will start with a project using the HL7 v3 Care Provision RM004000uv message to specify the data for a clinical domain, make the XML message with example data instances and have some hundreds systems sending in full records to a national registry for epidemiological /population based studies. Our experience is that the real work goes in the data specification and mapping to a standard / making archetypes (equivalents) but that the technical representation does not matter at all. Given harmonization work going on, I expect that the results of this study with HL7 v3 would similarly apply to OpenEHR. Another null hypothesis we can test. William Goossen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070127/ec101b03/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
