Modeling TRUST is nonsensical thing. Modeling DATA RELIABILITY is a nonsensical thing.
Both are complex concepts that partly depend on very subjective interpretations of people, processes, applications and hardware. But they depend as well on objective data about people, processes, applications and hardware. It is in this category that we must find ways to document the relevant objective co-determinants about people, processes, applications and hardware. Archetypes are the structures that capture these objective co- determinants. Stef's question is: What can we capture in Archetypes when we document outcomes of machine (medical device) generated data, and the people that operated these machines. Greetings Gerard -- <private> -- Gerard Freriks, MD Huigsloterdijk 378 2158 LR Buitenkaag The Netherlands T: +31 252544896 M: +31 620347088 E: gfrer at luna.nl Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 conexis --------------------------- Gerard Freriks, MD Huigsloterdijk 378 2158LR Buitenkaag the Netherlands M: +31 620347088 E: gf at conexis.nl On Jul 11, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Thomas Beale wrote: > I doubt if modelling data reliability at the Observation level is the > right approach if the real problem is trust with certain providers / > people in your care network....if you are going to record that kind of > thing, I would have thought you needed some kind of trust / confidence > markers in your provider registry... -- <private> -- Gerard Freriks, MD Huigsloterdijk 378 2158 LR Buitenkaag The Netherlands T: +31 252544896 M: +31 620347088 E: gfrer at luna.nl Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070712/34a581c3/attachment.html>
