I am not 100% certain on this but after a conversation with some people
inside the NHS NPfiT program it does seem that the CUI documentation
maybe licensed in such a way as to not allow for open implementation.  

This probably needs more legal research before we go off adopting
it.  ???


Cheers,
Tim





On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 06:59 +0100, Sam Heard wrote:
> Hi Gabriele
> 
> I know that some people within the NHS CUI group are absolutely
> committed to a Java version. We are hoping to work with the team to do
> a full open source .Net implementation of the controls which should be
> a good basis for the Java work.
> 
> I hope someone from that work contacts you via this email but if not
> let me know.
> 
> Cheers, Sam
> 
> gabriele.it wrote: 
> > Hi Sam,
> > 
> > I'm interested to an Java implementation based on Microsoft Health CUI,
> > 
> > do you know if already exist projects with this goal?
> > 
> > Many thanks,
> > 
> > Gabriele
> > 
> >   
> 
> -- 
> 
> Dr Sam Heard
> Chief Executive Officer
> Ocean Informatics
> 
> Director, openEHR Foundation
> Senior Visiting Research Fellow, University College London
> Aus: +61 4 1783 8808
> UK: +44 77 9871 0980
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
-- 
Timothy Cook, MSc
Health Informatics Research & Development Services
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook 
Skype ID == timothy.cook 
**************************************************************
*You may get my Public GPG key from  popular keyservers or   *
*from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home*
**************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080120/60ccf0b9/attachment.asc>

Reply via email to