From a 'necessity' prospective I would be in favor of a 'medication' DCM. I realize that this will be a complex one, which could be another reason to choose this it: if one can handle medication the rest is 'easy':-)
Cheers, Stef Op 21-nov-2008, om 11:21 heeft Williamtfgoossen at cs.com het volgende geschreven: > Dear all, > > A while ago in discussions on Detailed Clinical Models we > determined a Top 10 to start with. In practice these are only 9 > examples. > > My suggestion is to include the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer > risk as number 10. > > The other 9 items are: > > 1 weight > 2 lenght > 3 heart rate > 4 temperature > 5 blood pressure > 6 breathing (frequency) > 7 Apgar score > 8 Barthel index > 9 Glasgow Coma Scale. > > Note that the blood pressure archetype that includes a lot of > information that is in the DCM is currently reviewed against the > additional knowledge from the BP DCM example. > > Of course other items will be tackled later. > > My questions is if there are any objections in modelling the Braden > Scale as number 10. > > The question is not about the most appropriate modelling, it is > just on Braden Scale to be number 10 yes or no. > > > > > > Sincerely yours, > > dr. William TF Goossen > director > Results 4 Care b.v. > De Stinse 15 > 3823 VM Amersfoort > the Netherlands > email: Results4Care at cs.com > phone + 31654614458 > fax +3133 2570169 > www.results4care.nl > Dutch Chamber of Commerce number: 32133713 > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081121/7e21d764/attachment.html>
