Tom, thanks! I am losing track of all the possibilites to discuss and check. Before I log in there: What expects me there? Stefan Sauermann
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] Im Auftrag von Thomas Beale Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. September 2008 00:33 An: For openEHR clinical discussions Betreff: Re: AW: Chair of openEHR Clinical Review Board (CRB) .. your viewsplease Thomas Beale wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > I would suggest that in this eternal quest to 'merge standards' (I > have been hearing about it for 10 years now), we need understand that > standards are not all the same. To understand the differences we need > a small standards typology. The following is a rough classification. > > * A - standards for *concrete purpose-specific schemas, messages* > etc, such as for particular kinds of re-imbursement, order, lab > result etc; These schemas only have one use (although it might > be > * I put this up at the new wiki page http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/stds/Standards+Classification . Comments, further discussion welcome. - thomas beale * _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
