I think, this is clear Thanks Thomas.
Op 3-6-2010 20:18, Thomas Beale schreef: > > Bert, > > I don't think there is any reason for panic, quite the opposite. The > 2-line summary of the situation is: > > * everything is already open under either recognised licenses, > copyright, etc, apart from archetypes, which don't have a proper > license yet (but we treat them as being 100% open & free artefacts) > * In the future, we want to improve the copyright covering the > specifications to be a bit more standard, and designate a VERY > open license for archetypes & templates. > > The recent debate is really about which of the CC licenses to use for > archetypes and templates. > > openEHR is already about as open s you can get, and it is going to be > even more so soon. I think this will remove any doubts and help all > users and implementers. > > - thomas beale > > > On 03/06/2010 18:25, info wrote: >> To make this clear for implementers, this kind of messages can cause >> panic, because people do not understand, they really mess things up >> all the time. I have a half day job explaining license issues to >> people, and I am only a programmer (maybe that is why it takes so >> much time) >> ------------------------- >> Let's try my interpretation, excuse my third language English >> >> I think, anyone who reads the specifications, and thinks, I can do >> that on my own, in programming language XYZ, he will not get into >> trouble. >> Because, there may be copyright on the specifications, but they are >> not patented (thus, no protection on the ideas behind the specifications) >> >> Anyone who uses sourcecode (an implementation from someone else), has >> to comply to the conditions which are connected to that sourcecode, >> thus act accordingly. >> >> I think that I am right, or is there any objection to this? >> >> Thanks >> >> Bert >> * >> * > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100603/3863b759/attachment.html>
