I have to say that it is my impression nearly all activity IHTSDO talks about seems to be centred on either the international release aka 'the core' or the national release centres. I have not heard a single presentation or discussion talking about any details of lower-than-national level extensions, although there are examples in the meta-data map (from Nehta). But I was not trying to imply that this was policy in any way, only that I suspect that the thinking has not yet engaged with local and other kinds of extensions. I am certainly very happy if I am wrong, and everyone (but me) already knows how this should work...
- thomas On 06/05/2010 16:50, Mikael Nystr?m wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > As another member of IHTSDO Technical Committee I would like to ask > from where you have got your impression that RefSets should mainly be > maintained by the national release centers, because that is not at all > my impression. Some of the national release centers, like NHS in UK, > maintain Subsets/RefSets, but I have never heard anything about that > only the national release centers should create and maintain RefSets. > My impression is that whoever that find it useful to create and > maintain an own RefSet should be able to do it. > > The only requirement to create a RefSet is the technical requirement > to have an own namespace to create the RefSet into. However, all > organizations and persons with a valid SNOMED CT license can get an > own namespace. > > (I have my own namespace, so if I would I could immediately produce > and release as many RefSets that I want.) > > Greetings, > > Mikael > * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100506/8147036b/attachment.html>
