Dear Ian:

Sorry it took me some days to get back to you. I?m also sending this mail to 
the Clinical Discussion List as it may benefit others. 

The proposed pulmonary function archetype is also adequate for adult use, I 
took some extra time to have it checked by the Chief of Intensive Care at my 
Hospital. The archetype is detailed enough for international use.

Your assumption is correct VO2max does merit a separate archetype included as a 
subset of a more detailed "Exercise Stress Testing" arquetype. 
The VO2max has its clinical fundamentals for assessment of cardiovascular 
function which may or may not have a pulmonary component. 

So the pulmonary function test archetype could take the value from the Exercise 
Stress Test arquetype  and also if a cardiac patient also have a Lung 
impairment the Exercise Stress Testing should read the values pre & post 
bronchodilation.

The reason for showing the archetypes at my Hospital (and it worked as planned) 
was to get more Clinical experts into the Clinical Modelling process. I will be 
meeting next week the Chief of Acute Coronary Unit to discuss the modelling of 
the more General "Stress Exercise Testing" I?ll keep the list informed.

Wow! For me an excellent way to finish 2011 :)

Happy new years to all :=)

Domingo


Hi Domingo,

Thanks for offering to have a look at this archetype. It was 
developed
for use in a Paediatric EMR in Slovenia but very much as a 
candidate
for international use.

One of the issues I suspect you might 
challenge is whether V02max
merits a separate archetype.

Ian

Dr 
Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile 
+44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

Clinical 
Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
Director/Clinical Knowledge 
Editor openEHR Foundation  www.openehr.org/knowledge
Honorary 
Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
SCIMP Working Group, NHS 
Scotland
BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org
                                          
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111230/730fbdcc/attachment.html>

Reply via email to