Just out of the Risk analysis box see eg. ISO 14971: Took me some time to figure it out, so I share it just in case:
Risk consists of: - A hazard - a probability that this hazard will typically occur - the severity of the harm that this hazard will cause on humans or non-human subjects - probability together with severity will describe the risk some parts of this may well be observations, others will be evaluations Greetings from Vienna, Stefan Sauermann Program Director Biomedical Engineering Sciences (Master) University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien Hoechstaedtplatz 5, 1200 Vienna, Austria P: +43 1 333 40 77 - 988 M: +43 664 6192555 E: stefan.sauermann at technikum-wien.at I: www.technikum-wien.at/mbe I: www.technikum-wien.at/ibmt I: www.healthy-interoperability.at Am 14.08.2012 15:46, schrieb Gerard Freriks: > The risk itself is an Evaluation and can be used to store data about the risk. > The procedure/method to do the calculation is not an artefact that will be > stored, but referred to in the Evaluation. > > Using a RM and an AOM it must be possible to specify in a Composition type of > artefact the components (queries) and the > procedure/method/algorithm/calculation, etc. > Provided we have a standardised way to express the needed logical operations, > calculations, etc. > > Gerard Freriks > +31 620347088 > gfrer at luna.nl > > > > > On 14 Aug 2012, at 14:19, Shinji KOBAYASHI wrote: > >> Hi Koray, >> >> I think it would be a composition with observation and evaluation archetypes. >> In my experience on surveillance program, your form could be built up >> these items. >> * OBSERVATION >> History of medication, smoking >> * EVALUATION >> Diagnosis, GP assessment status >> (INSTRUCTION/ACTION) >> Medication(GP prescribed/prescribing) >> >> However, I am not sure which should be. >> >> Shinji >> >> 2012/8/14 Koray Atalag<k.atalag at nihi.auckland.ac.nz>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> There's a CVD risk assessment tool I?m working on which prepopulates >>> clinical info from GP software. This includes diagnoses, smoking status and >>> checklist for certain medications. Note that some of the underlying info >>> might be coming from previous visits (e.g. problem list type) but also can >>> be newly entered as a result of GP?s assessment. Now, regardless of what >>> happens in GP software, when it is transferred onto this tool (whether >>> automatically prepopulating and/or manual entry) are these Observations or >>> Evaluations? Note that the GP does not make any further clinical judgement >>> here, just rephrase existing data for a different purpose. My gut feeling is >>> the former (Observation). >>> >>> >>> >>> I know this is tricky and has been brought to this list many times here but >>> thoughts? Masters? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> >>> -koray >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-clinical mailing list >>> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org >>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-clinical mailing list >> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
