Hello all, I can announce (we just got the confirmation for the funding last week) that the Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) in collaboration with the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) will organise a 20 hours workshop about CEN/ISO 13606 next June/July at Belo Horizonte, in Brazil. There are still many details to be decided, but I think it can be of interest for many people in that region (the workshop will be in Spanish).
UPV has already given 5 courses about 13606 in Spain and 2 in Dublin and I completely agree with the general feeling. It is very complicated to find a balance between the technical and the clinical details for an heterogeneous group (which is the usual case), but at the end then is when we learn more, by sharing views from clinical and technical attendants. I also agree that some kind of adaptation is needed for each case, but I don't think this is a big problem. Most of the course topics can usually be maintained. Apart from these activities of UPV, I'm currently the chair of the Education Committee at the EN 13606 Association. One of the objectives of the Association is to provide training and develop a certification process for competences on the use of the norm. It is clear that these activities have a great overlap with those related to openEHR, and we should work for an alignment here (as for the specifications themselves :-). Probably, the competences for a CEN/ISO 13606 user/implementer and for an openEHR user/implementer are more than 75% the same. My intention is to present a Training and Certification Plan for CEN/ISO 13606 at the Association General Assembly next February in Seville. All of you are invited to participate in any of these activities and I will be happy to share and discuss our approach in this topic. Regards, David 2012/1/3 pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com> > Hi everyone, > > Recently we have ended the first edition of the course with a huge > success. And now we are thinking about the next steps to take. > > Here is a post on my blog about the conclusions and future actions: > http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/2012/01/conclusiones-del-curso-de-openehr-en.html > (yo can see it in english by clicking ENGLISH on the top right corner of > the blog). > > > *I want to share with the community a couple of ideas mentioned there. It > would be very nice to know what you think.* > > *openEHR certification:* > > The first idea is on standarizing openEHR training, and to think about an > openEHR certification. I think this could be very good for the community > and for the openEHR organization too. > > It could be possible to create a mail list for openEHR trainers ( > openehr-trainers at openehr.org)? So we could discuss about the topics and > ways of evaluation, and come out with an standard minimal program to all > openEHR courses. > > If we reach a standard minimal program for openEHR courses, could we get > formal support from openEHR.org to issue internationally valid openEHR > certificates? (obviously this is a question for the future, but IMO we need > to start thinking about it now). > > > *10 projects to adopt openEHR:* > > We thought about 10 projects (or so) in two areas: software and clinical > modeling. > > Because openEHR propose a tool-chain based process of creating EHRs, we > need to have each one of the links of that chain in order to adopt and > implement openEHR easily. > > Now there is a little tooling available, and some of it is not open > source. In projects at a national level we need to use open source > software, because each country will need to make it's own customizations to > each tool. > > In the other hand, we need to model other things that are clinical > knowledge too, like processes and rules to enable CDS, in order to support > full EHR implementation (e.g. I think we could recommend ways to express > rules based on archetype ids and paths, and create software tools to > support that specification, but we need to work the openEHR services specs > first....). > > There is a diagram on my blog post that shows the tools we propose to 1. > develope if there is no tool that support its functionality or it's > closed-source, 2. improve the current open source tools. > > On the clinical modeling side, we have engaged doctors and nurses on the > creation and translation of archetypes. Now there are two of our students > that already commited archetypes to the CKM: Dr. Domingo Liotta and Dr. > Leonardo Der Jachadurian. > > I hope we could propose to create prototypes of those projects in out > local universities and coordinate the projects so we do not overlap each > other, with the objective of completing the tool chain with open source > developments. > > > > What do you think? > > > -- > Kind regards, > Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez > LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez > Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos <http://twitter.com/ppazos> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical > -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120105/f3716c50/attachment.html>
