I like your reasoning Bert. 2014-10-03 10:15 GMT+02:00 Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl>:
> On 03-10-14 01:36, Bert Verhees wrote: > >> org.openehr:openehr-ehr-composition.something:1.0.0 >> > > It seems wise to me to not regard the version-indication as a part of the > archetypeId, the same for the namespace. > > The archetypeId is to indicate what the conceptual contents of the > archetype is about. > The version does not changes this, so it should not be part of the > archetypeId, the same for the namespace. > > This idea justifies the use of the colon between namespace and archetypeId > and between version and archetypeId. > It also makes the use of the "v" before the version unnecessary. > > "V" is a language-specific indication, "v" stands for "version", and > "version" is an English/Latin term. > In Danish they say "udgave", in Russian it is "??????", in Hebrew: "????", > in Arabic: "????", in Maori: "putanga" and in Chinese: "??" > > Wonderful tool, Google translate ;-) > > Bert > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > clinical_lists.openehr.org > -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141003/15177336/attachment.html>
