The recommendation is to always use the same archetypes you would have used to originally record that information. That is the best way to ensure the systems work when retrieving information. For example if you query about medications taken by the patient you only have to query the ACTION archetype instead of searching information scattered in other archetypes.
David 2015-04-07 11:19 GMT+02:00 pazospablo at hotmail.com <pazospablo at hotmail.com>: > Hi David. A medication taken should be an action or an observation? What > matters more, the event of taking the drug ot yhat thr drug eas taken? I > think the latter can occur when a doctor asks the patient for medication > taken. I agree the real time record of the event can also occur. > > > Thanks! > > > Sent from my LG Mobile > > ------ Original message------ > > *From: *David Moner > > *Date: *Tue, Apr 7, 2015 03:41 > > *To: *For openEHR clinical discussions; > > *Cc: *openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org; > > *Subject:*Re: ACTION just as event trigger > Hi Pablo, > > Think that an ACTION can happen without any previous instruction. For > example, a medication taken without a previous prescription. That > information has to be stored not just as a log, but as proper clinical > data. So it seems OK that ACTION includes part of the clinical record. > > David > > 2015-04-07 4:06 GMT+02:00 pazospablo at hotmail.com <pazospablo at > hotmail.com>: > >> A couple of week ago someone mebtioned that ACTION archetypes are not >> being developed or used a lot, and maybe is because we actually don't need >> to put data on ACTIONs as part of the clinical record, but maybe only as >> event trigger and logs of ehat happened. With tgis I mean: ACTION recording >> might be used ti send notifications to other statems (like whe a lab test >> is done, the results are sent or queried), or to keep the log of real world >> events that happened and may change the status of another entity (i.e. >> INSTRUCTION/ACTIVITY). >> >> >> What is the opinion of the community about the role of the ACTION ENTRY >> in the openEHR Information Model and as a EHR entity, from the point of >> view of it's use in current systems? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Pablo. >> >> >> Sent from my LG Mobile >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-clinical mailing list >> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org >> >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org >> <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists..openehr.org> >> > > > > -- > David Moner Cano > Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME > Instituto ITACA > http://www.ibime.upv.es > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner > > Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) > Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta > Valencia - 46022 (Espa?a) > -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta Valencia - 46022 (Espa?a) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20150407/91703620/attachment-0001.html>
