Hi everyone, Based on requirements from the Norwegian National Summary Care Record (Norwegian: "Kjernejournal"), and Heather's email about therapeutic precautions (https://omowizard.wordpress.com/2014/07/16/therapeutic-precautions-are-the-new-black/), we've made an archetype to represent the concept "Therapeutic precaution" in the EHR.
At the moment the archetype is sitting as a proposal in the international CKM, with a few comments by Ian, Heather and myself. Heather and I agree this concept could benefit greatly from a wider discussion, so we'd like to invite you all to have a look at it and make comments. Since the details of proposed archetypes are for now only visible to CKM editors, I'm attaching the ADL file here. I'm also including the previous comments here: [cid:image001.png@01D18091.B908F400] Agree this is a good candidate but there is some cross-over with Contraindication. Perhaps this should replace or be folded in to Contra-indication, and Contra-indication renamed? ian.mcnicoll (04-Mar-2016 08:22) [cid:image001.png@01D18091.B908F400] The main difference between a therapeutic precaution and a contraindication is that a contraindication is a specific procedure, etc, while a therapeutic precaution is a condition or state. Contraindication is therefore more useful for decision support, while precautions should be shown to clinicians. silje.bakke (04-Mar-2016 09:00) [cid:image001.png@01D18091.B908F400] Hi all, this is reflecting the notion of therapeutic precautions from my blog post, I think. I like the idea of this approach, especially avoiding 'warning', 'alert' etc which means different things to every clinician, vendor etc. But it is not mainstream. To me it is a little like the Exclusion family of archetypes - we may need to socialise it a little. And of course, use 'Alert', 'Warning' appropriately in the keywords. We may need to add date/times for periods of validity, status etc as per the current Alert archetype. But what we have gained is a very precise definition and intent for use (if we get this right). Regards Heather heather.leslie (08-Mar-2016 05:45) Last modified by heather.leslie (08-Mar-2016 05:48). So please, have a look, and tell us what you think, good or bad. But bear in mind, the archetype is not at all intended to be anywhere near finished, and is still very rough. Kind regards, Silje Ljosland Bakke Information Architect, RN Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes National ICT Norway Tel. +47 40203298 Web: http://arketyper.no<http://arketyper.no/> / Twitter: @arketyper_no<https://twitter.com/arketyper_no>
openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.precaution.v0.adl
Description: openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.precaution.v0.adl
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
