I would say one needs both: Evaluation: when calculating by the author the BMI-number using existing weight/height data Observation: when reading/copying by the author aa a BMI-result from a source
Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl > On 10 Apr 2017, at 08:33, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > Shouldn't the BMI archetype on CKM be of type Evaluation? One does not > observe BMI, it is a calculation. > openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.body_mass_index.v1 > Thanks for your comments. > > Bert > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org