Hi Silje, Interesting idea. Gender dysphoria might be difficult to describe by diagnosis archetype. However, Cluster.gender(or sex) is handy to slot into demographic.person archetype.
Shinji 2019年4月2日(火) 17:09 Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-clinical <[email protected]>: > > Hi everyone, > > > > On revisiting the archetype CLUSTER.gender, we’ve discussed changing the > class of the archetype to EVALUATION. The reasoning behind this is that the > original use cases we thought would be relevant for this archetype, such as > nesting it within a lab result or an interpreter request, aren’t really > relevant anymore. We now believe the archetype is more useful in a persistent > composition. > > > > Are there any use cases we haven’t thought of, where it’s necessary to nest > this archetype within ENTRY archetypes? > > > > Kind regards, > Silje Ljosland Bakke > > > > Information Architect, RN > > Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes > Nasjonal IKT HF, Norway > > Tel. +47 40203298 > > Web: http://arketyper.no / Twitter: @arketyper_no > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
