Gerard I am using the term 'assumed' value in the archetype editor. This seems helpful as it means that it does not have to be recorded and it is normal practice. A single BP reading is assumed to be sitting - possibly lying - but not standing. Weight is assumed to be measured in light clothing and without shoes...
For legacy systems this approach seems beneficial as there will be a lot of data missing! Cheers, Sam > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org > [mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org]On Behalf Of Gerard Freriks > Sent: Monday, 4 August 2003 9:36 PM > To: Thomas Beale; Jim Warren > Cc: 'openehr-technical at openehr.org' > Subject: Re: Encoding concept-relationships in openehr archetypes. > > > Hi, > > Is it? > Is it about how to represent the domain "normal values"? > > Or is it more general: Are concepts related? > Then the problem is: what relations are there between concepts > (archetypes)? > What semantics of these relationships between archetypes (concepts) do we > need to describe reallity (including decision support)? > > Gerard > > > > On 2003-08-04 5:38, "Thomas Beale" <thomas at deepthought.com.au> wrote: > > >> Admittedly, I'm slipping into the realm of decision support, > but I think it > >> really is simply the structure of the domain of normal values in this > >> specific > >> application. I'd like to use archetypes to represent this, > just as a I might > >> use them to represent the min and max of a given quantity. Is > the capability > >> all there already? If not, what's missing? > >> > > -- <private> -- > Gerard Freriks, arts > Huigsloterdijk 378 > 2158 LR Buitenkaag > The Netherlands > > +31 252 544896 > +31 654 792800 > > > - > If you have any questions about using this list, > please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
