Matias I have developed an ontology of archetypes in Protege - it has been a large endeavour and I think is starting to get there.
I am happy to send this to you to have a look at. I believe OWL and Protege are merging their approaches. Cheers, Sam > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org > [mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org]On Behalf Of Matias Klein > Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2003 8:15 AM > To: openehr-technical at openehr.org > Subject: Ontology Standard for Archtypes > > > Hello All, > > I was just looking over W3C's Ontology Web Language (OWL), and was > wondering if anyone had thoughts on the subject as it related to > openEHR. > > Should openEHR archetypes be modeled using OWL or another "standard" > syntax? > > If openEHR archtypes are compatible with a standardized ontology > description language, then generic ontology viewing and manipulation > tools could be used on them. > > Perhaps the alternative of converting openEHR archetypes into OWL > representations with XSLT and then using generic tools is preferable? > > Any ideas? > > -Matias > > ============ > Matias Klein > Ethidium Health Systems > 1447 Rhoades Drive > Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006-2623 > USA > http://www.ethidium.com > > > > > - > If you have any questions about using this list, > please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
