Philippe, I agree - your work has been an inspiration to us to keep going with the approach we have chosen. There is no doubt that we need an ontological underpinning in our work - and its relation to the ontological underpinning of terminology should be clear.
For a start we are populating archetypes that are discreet and can be specialised for use in different situations. It is possible that the more terminological approach you have taken would be the best link from the archetype to pure terminologies such as SNOMED and ICD-10. I am interested in where you see the ideal line and where your work sits with SNOMED-CT. Cheers, Sam - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
