Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote:
> In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 18:00:54 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
> schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com:
>
>
>> Maybe you're right, the definitions could be added as comments, but for
>> proprietary terminology like SNOMED CT this will mean that these kind of
>> archetypes can only be distributed to people that have paid the license.
>
> Sorry, but Snomed CT cannot be considered a proprietary terminology given the
> formal international SDO status from January onward.
>
> Further, most English speaking countries (Cnd, UK, US, Aus, Nw Zealand)
> already have a national licence allowing everyone to use it for health
> purposes.
But it is not an *open* system - and this is OpenEHR...
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
