I agree - I was only joking :-)
On 12/2/07, Eddy Rospide <edrs22 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> PDF would require at the very least the Adobe Acrobat Reader on the local
> machine to be read. While I understand the finality of using PDF for medical
> purposes, it becomes even more difficult to work with if you want to convert
> it to plan text for query purposes.
>
> Eddy
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Grahame Grieve <grahame at kestral.com.au>
> To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2007 7:25:12 PM
> Subject: Re: New Standard Proposal
>
> > PDF is ubiquitous, makes complete sense.
>
> html is even more ubiquitious. I propose that
> we use html.
>
> Grahame
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
> ________________________________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
